Ermengard of Namur 957–1010 – Whos Your Daddy? Wikigenealogy

WHOSYERDAD-E

Who's Your Daddy?
Wikigenealogy

Ermengard of Namur, 957–1010 (aged 53 years)

Name

Ermengard of Namur

Name: Ermengard of /Namur/
Surname: Namur
Given names: Ermengard of

Sex Female

Date differences

Family with parents
father	Links Birth: about 959 39 17 — Bef. 1011 Marriage: about 990 Unique identifier: D9B66AB4C7D00E43A2906CC1DE8362984FFF Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Ermangarde of Lorraine AlbertII Count of Namur Luigarde of Namur Ermengard of Namur Albert I Count of Namur 959–… Birth: about 959 39 17 — Bef. 1011
mother	Links Birth: 975 5 Marriage: about 990 Death: 1044 Unique identifier: D9B66AB4C7D00E43A2906CC1DE8362984FFF Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Albert I Count of Namur AlbertII Count of Namur Luigarde of Namur Ermengard of Namur Ermangarde of Lorraine 975–1044 Birth: 975 5 Death: 1044
Marriage	Marriage — about 990 —
8 years younger brother	Links Birth: about 997 38 22 Marriage: before 10 August 1035 Death: about 1064 Unique identifier: 2A6C0AD8C1075443912A2FB6D1234EF4AD07 Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Regilinde of Lorraine AlbertIII Count of Namur Hedwige of Namur AlbertII Count of Namur 997–1064 Birth: about 997 38 22 Death: about 1064
sister	Links Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Luigarde of Namur …–…
herself	Links Birth: about 957 -2 -18 Death: about 1010 Unique identifier: FCF0945E06A1E34FAE6A22B59B89344341E3 Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse OttoI Count of Warcq LouisI of Chigny Ermengard of Namur 957–1010 Birth: about 957 -2 -18 Death: about 1010

Family with OttoI Count of Warcq
partner	Links Birth: about 942 25 17 Death: 1010 Death: 1013 Unique identifier: FCF0945E06A1E34FAE6A22B59B89344341E3 Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Ermengard of Namur LouisI of Chigny OttoI Count of Warcq 942–1010 Birth: about 942 25 17 Death: 1010
herself	Links Birth: about 957 -2 -18 Death: about 1010 Unique identifier: FCF0945E06A1E34FAE6A22B59B89344341E3 Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse OttoI Count of Warcq LouisI of Chigny Ermengard of Namur 957–1010 Birth: about 957 -2 -18 Death: about 1010
son	Links Birth: about 975 33 18 Death: 1025 Unique identifier: C2C8BC7F3C6A6D44B21A6C00815657CF51E8 Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Adelaide deSt.Varne LouisII Count of Chigny LouisI of Chigny 975–1025 Birth: about 975 33 18 Death: 1025

Events of close relatives
Birth	about 957 -2 -18
Birth of a son	LouisI of Chigny about 975
Death of a paternal grandfather	Robert I Count of Namur 981
Marriage of parents	Albert I Count of Namur — Ermangarde of Lorraine — View this family about 990
Birth of a brother	AlbertII Count of Namur about 997
Death of a maternal grandfather	Otto Duke of Lorraine about 1010
Death of a husband	OttoI Count of Warcq 1010
Death	about 1010 (aged 53 years)
Unique identifier	F3F73EC17399034BB446C4A675808A5C82B6
Last change	23 January 2007 – 19:13:57

Show all notes
Note	Notes ES VII:42. Stuart's "Royalty for Commoners," (65:36). Settipani's "La prehistoire des Capetiens" notes that "l'Art de verifierles dates" gives the wife of Otto as Ermengarde or Marguerite (!), dau.of Adalbert I of Namur, but it is clear that Settipani considers thissource too unreliable to be taken seriously.