… Eaba 732–… – Whos Your Daddy? Wikigenealogy

Who's Your Daddy?
Wikigenealogy

… Eaba, 732–…

Name

… Eaba

Name: /Eaba/
Surname: Eaba

Sex Male

Date differences

Family with parents
father	Links Birth: 706 26 — Wessex, Eng. Unique identifier: 4B8EF6B540E07A498062D71098D16F656DBA Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse … Eaba Eoppa of Wessex 706–… Birth: 706 26 — Wessex, Eng.
himself	Links Birth: 732 26 — Wessex, Eng. Unique identifier: 47D7B05BD8AAA741A70F3673DF5DAE3612CE Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Ealhmund Under-King of Kent … Eaba 732–… Birth: 732 26 — Wessex, Eng.

… Eaba + … …
himself	Links Birth: 732 26 — Wessex, Eng. Unique identifier: 47D7B05BD8AAA741A70F3673DF5DAE3612CE Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Ealhmund Under-King of Kent … Eaba 732–… Birth: 732 26 — Wessex, Eng.
son	Links Birth: 758 26 — Wessex, Eng. Death: 788 Unique identifier: 33CB51CF65D49D4CA7CE80C9A01A91559EB8 Links Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Ecbryht King of Wessex Ealhmund Under-King of Kent 758–788 Birth: 758 26 — Wessex, Eng. Death: 788

Events of close relatives
Birth	732 26 Wessex, Eng.
Birth of a son	Ealhmund Under-King of Kent 758 Wessex, Eng.
Death of a son	Ealhmund Under-King of Kent 788
Unique identifier	4E71256ABDF7CB4ABEBE9650B956DA2688DE
Last change	23 January 2007 – 19:13:56

Show all notes
Note	Notes Weis' "Ancestral Roots. . ." (1:11). Did not rule. jparsons@chass.utoronto.ca (John Carmi Parsons) posted toGEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com on 30 Dec 1998 Subject: Re: Egbert of England: . "It should be borne in mind that the earlier generations of the Wessexgenealogy, as we possess it today, bear many hallmarks of what are knownas foundation myths and may very well be inventions, long after the fact,to glorify retro- actively the history of the dynasty that eventuallyunified England. In particular, there are many discrepancies between theaccount of the foundation of Wessex given by Bede and that in theAnglo-Saxon Chronicle. The unreliability of many of the dates in theearlier generations of the pedigree is now taken for granted, and thereis no way to reconcile the Chronicle's strong implication that Cerdic'speople first settled in S. Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, with Bede'sstatement centuries earlier that Hampshire and Wight were not broughtunder the dominion of the kings of Wessex until much later. We also have2 distinct versions of the pedigree, one making Cynric the son of Cerdicand the other making him Cerdic's grandson (son of Cerdic's son Creoda).Finally, some name elements in the first generations of the Wessexpedigree, esp. Cynric itself, appear more British (!) than Saxon. . For an excellent, concise and highly readable summary of problemssurrounding all the early Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies, see BarbaraYorke's Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo-Saxon England (Hardback:Seaby, 1990, rpt 1992; ppb Routledge, 1997 ISBN 0-415-16639-X)."

Show all notes

Note

Notes
Weis' "Ancestral Roots. . ." (1:11). Did not rule.
jparsons@chass.utoronto.ca (John Carmi Parsons) posted toGEN-MEDIEVAL-L@rootsweb.com on 30 Dec 1998
Subject: Re: Egbert of England:
. "It should be borne in mind that the earlier generations of the Wessexgenealogy, as we possess it today, bear many hallmarks of what are knownas foundation myths and may very well be inventions, long after the fact,to glorify retro- actively the history of the dynasty that eventuallyunified England. In particular, there are many discrepancies between theaccount of the foundation of Wessex given by Bede and that in theAnglo-Saxon Chronicle. The unreliability of many of the dates in theearlier generations of the pedigree is now taken for granted, and thereis no way to reconcile the Chronicle's strong implication that Cerdic'speople first settled in S. Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, with Bede'sstatement centuries earlier that Hampshire and Wight were not broughtunder the dominion of the kings of Wessex until much later. We also have2 distinct versions of the pedigree, one making Cynric the son of Cerdicand the other making him Cerdic's grandson (son of Cerdic's son Creoda).Finally, some name elements in the first generations of the Wessexpedigree, esp. Cynric itself, appear more British (!) than Saxon.
. For an excellent, concise and highly readable summary of problemssurrounding all the early Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies, see BarbaraYorke's Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo-Saxon England (Hardback:Seaby, 1990, rpt 1992; ppb Routledge, 1997 ISBN 0-415-16639-X)."