The Children of Adam and Eve

Sekhemib-Perenmaat, a poorly attested pharaoh of the Egyptian second dynasty, may have been the same individual also known as Peribsen, or, More likely, was a separate King who ruled Lower Egypt at the same time that Peribsen ruled Upper Egypt.Recent archaeological evidence from the Saqqara supports the theory of a Sekhemib-Perenmaat to Khasekhemwy royal succession. Peribsen is attested exclusively in Upper Egyptian sites such as Abydos and Elephantine which also suggests that he hadlost control of Lower Egypt during his reign. No second dynasty objects or texts containing Peribsen's name have ever been found in the Saqqara site. By contrast, Sekhemib-Perenmaat is attested in Saqqara and his tomb at Umm el-Qa'ab lies closeto the tomb of Khasekhemwy, the final King of the 2nd Dynasty. It has also been argued that Sekhemib-Perenmaat was a predecessor of Khasekhemwy.

This hypothesis is now supported by the discovery of a fragmentary seal impression of Sekhemib-Perenmaat in the Umm el-Qaab tomb of Khasekhemwy (V, on sack-sealings from rooms 31-33, directly north of the burial chamber) by Günter Dreyer. Thisfind reinforces the hypothesis of a direct Sekhemib-Perenmaat to Khasekhemwy succession toWards the end of the Egypt's second dynasty, notes Francesco Raffaele. Where Peribsen fits into this new chronology is unknown at present.

Sekhemib-Perenmaat, a poorly attested pharaoh of the Egyptian second dynasty, may have been the same individual also known as Peribsen, or, More likely, was a separate king who ruled Lower Egypt at the same time that Peribsen ruled Upper Egypt.Recent archaeological evidence from the Saqqara supports the theory of a Sekhemib-Perenmaat to Khasekhemwy royal succession. Peribsen is attested exclusively in Upper Egyptian sites such as Abydos and Elephantine which also suggests that he hadlost control of Lower Egypt during his reign. No second dynasty objects or texts containing Peribsen's name have ever been found in the Saqqara site. By contrast, Sekhemib-Perenmaat is attested in Saqqara and his tomb at Umm el-Qa'ab lies closeto the tomb of Khasekhemwy, the final king of the 2nd Dynasty. It has also been argued that Sekhemib-Perenmaat was a predecessor of Khasekhemwy.

This hypothesis is now supported by the discovery of a fragmentary seal impression of Sekhemib-Perenmaat in the Umm el-Qaab tomb of Khasekhemwy (V, on sack-sealings from rooms 31-33, directly north of the burial chamber) by Günter Dreyer. Thisfind reinforces the hypothesis of a direct Sekhemib-Perenmaat to Khasekhemwy succession toWards the end of the Egypt's second dynasty, notes Francesco Raffaele. Where Peribsen fits into this new chronology is unknown at present.